合作原则视角下《劝导》的会话含义分析_英语论文.doc

  • 需要金币1000 个金币
  • 资料目录论文助手 > 外语研究 > 英语论文网站 >
  • 转换比率:金钱 X 10=金币数量, 例100元=1000金币
  • 论文格式:Word格式(*.doc)
  • 更新时间:2017-10-08
  • 论文字数:9060
  • 课题出处:(梦溪)提供原创资料
  • 资料包括:完整论文

支付并下载

Abstract: Criticisms and reviews on Persuasion, the world classic written by the famous British woman writer Jane Austen, have been too numerous to mention individually. Most of  the comments were from the literary perspective. The pragmatics in linguistics provides language studies with not only a brand-new theoretical perspective but also feasible practical techniques. This paper, as a qualitative case study, attempts to analyze the conversational implicature of dialogues in Persuasion by employing Cooperative Principle, in order to explore the way of analyzing literary works from perspective of pragmatics. The illustrations are classified into different categories in accordance with its violation of the maxim of Cooperative Principle. By exploring the conversational implicature from the approach of pragmatics in Persuasion, this paper hopes to contribute to the understanding this world classic, and help shed some light on the usefulness of the pragmatic approach to the interpretation of fictions, and enrich the conventional criticism on Jane Austen.

 

Key words: conversational implicature; Cooperative Principle; Persuasion

 

Contents

Abstract

中文摘要

1. Introduction-1

2. Theoretical Basis: Cooperative Principle (CP)-4

2.1 Definitions-4

2.1.1 Definition of CP-4

2.1.2 Definition of Conversational Implicature-4

2.2 Classification of CP-5

2.2.1 The Four Maxims of CP-6

2.2.2 Violation of the Four Maxims-7

3. Analysis of Conversational Implicature in Persuasion-8

3.1 Violation of the Quality Maxim in Persuasion-9

3.2 Violation of the Quantity Maxim in Persuasion-11

3.3 Violation of the Relation Maxim in Persuasion-15

3.4 Violation of the Manner Maxim in Persuasion-17

4. Conclusion-18


支付并下载

提示:本站支持手机(IOS,Android)下载论文,如果手机下载不知道存哪或打不开,可以用电脑下载,不会重复扣费